OpenAI Is Now Everything It Promised Not to Be: Corporate, Closed-Source, and For-Profit
Source: vice.com (direct link)
I don’t know enough about OpenAI to evaluate these concerns, but I think these questions are important. The power of AI means that the companies that control them are also in a position of power, and it’s important that we treat them critically. That said, while I do think making LLM code open source is probably better in the aggregate, it isn’t without concerning drawbacks: The minute it was released under an open license, I’m sure Gab’s Andrew Torba would be considering how to make a homebrew version that can’t be content moderated.
Similar Posts:
🔗 linkblog: As conservatives criticize ‘woke AI,’ here are ChatGPT’s rules for answering culture war queries - The Verge'
🔗 linkblog: Conservatives Are Obsessed With Getting ChatGPT to Say the N-Word'
🔗 linkblog: OpenAI Used Kenyan Workers on Less Than $2 Per Hour: Exclusive | Time'
🔗 linkblog: ChatGPT is a data privacy nightmare, and we ought to be concerned | Ars Technica'
🔗 linkblog: Disinformation Researchers Raise Alarms About A.I. Chatbots - The New York Times'
Comments:
You can click on the < button in the top-right of your browser window to read and write comments on this post with Hypothesis. You can read more about how I use this software here.