š linkblog: my thoughts on 'The Case of the Internet Archive vs. Book Publishers - The New York Times'
- One minute read - 63 words - kudos:Good coverage of a worrying development. I’m sympathetic to authors’ worries here, but I also think they’re wrong. If digital is different than the physical, copyright considerations need to be more generous, NOT stricter. The Internet Archive is an important service, and I’m worried about the future. link to ‘The Case of the Internet Archive vs. Book Publishers - The New York Times’
Similar Posts:
š linkblog: just finished 'Penguin Random House Demands Removal Of Maus From Digital Library Because The Book Is Popular Again | Techdirt'
š linkblog: just finished 'Internet Archive Supports the Marylandās Library eBook Fairness Law - Internet Archive Blogs'
š linkblog: my thoughts on 'Academic Book About Emojis Canāt Include The Emojis It Talks About Because Of Copyright | Techdirt'
š linkblog: my thoughts on 'The Fanfic Sex Trope That Caught a Plundering AI Red-Handed | WIRED'
š linkblog: my thoughts on 'āThe library is a safe place.ā ā WIL WHEATON dot NET'
Comments:
You can click on the < button in the top-right of your browser window to read and write comments on this post with Hypothesis. You can read more about how I use this software here.
Any Webmentions from Micro.blog will also be displayed below: