Journalists “deeply troubled” by OpenAI’s content deals with Vox, The Atlantic
Source: story link, from arstechnica.com
In a roundabout way, I think this helps demonstrate why scraping data for generative AI isn’t a question of copyright. Even when there is a legal agreement, it can still be exploitative—it’s a question of digital labor.
Similar Posts:
đź”— linkblog: OpenAI, Mass Scraper of Copyrighted Work, Claims Copyright Over Subreddit's Logo'
I have lots of concerns about LLM training, but I think it’s better to think of the issue in terms of digital labor, not copyright. My blog is licensed for reuse, but that doesn’t mean it’s any less exploitative for someone to scrape it all to develop software that will make them rich off my work.
đź”— linkblog: OpenAI loses its voice'
đź”— linkblog: Stack Overflow users sabotage their posts after OpenAI deal'
Stack Exchange and digital labor
Comments:
You can click on the < button in the top-right of your browser window to read and write comments on this post with Hypothesis. You can read more about how I use this software here.