Currently reading David Graeber’s “Debt: The First 5,000 Years,” and while it’s really dense, one clear theme is how money has the power to abstract our moral thinking in dangerous directions. This NYT blurb seemed relevant.
Similar Posts:
Love to be living in a world where a blog I read for tech commentary—and that is more reserved than I would be on a lot of that commentary—is running articles describing current goings-on as “a coup in progress.”
🔗 linkblog: my thoughts on 'The Twitter Files Playbook Comes For The US Government'
It’s obviously not the most worrying thing about it, but a very specific tragedy about Musk’s DOGE nonsense is that it may end up being the largest (indirect) influence Homestar Runner has had on the world.
🔗 linkblog: my thoughts on 'The NTSB chooses Elon Musk’s X to update the press on plane crashes'
🔗 linkblog: my thoughts on 'Elon’s Twitter Destruction Playbook Hits The US Government, And It’s Even More Dangerous'
Comments:
You can click on the <
button in the top-right of your browser window to read and write comments on this post with Hypothesis. You can read more about how I use this software here.