Below are posts associated with the “wsj.com” source.
🔗 linkblog: The Tactics Elon Musk Uses to Manage His ‘Legion’ of Babies—and Their Mothers
Creepy as hell. Gift link.
🔗 linkblog: How Elon Musk’s Impulses Transformed Twitter - WSJ'
What a mess this whole thing has been.
🔗 linkblog: Cleaning Up ChatGPT’s Language Takes Heavy Toll on Human Workers - WSJ'
Everyone excited about generative AI needs to account for this kind of thing. We don’t pay enough attention to digital labor and the dehumanizing aspects of content moderation.
🔗 linkblog: AI Junk Is Starting to Pollute the Internet - WSJ'
I’ve seen some reviews describe the new Mission Impossible movie (apparently featuring a malicious AI) as perfectly suited for our time of ChatGPT. I’m more worried about things like this: content farming, model collapse, etc.
🔗 linkblog: People Can’t Stop ‘Spotify Snooping’ on Friends, Exes and Crushes - WSJ'
This is dumb and gross, and another reason I’ll never use Spotify.
🔗 linkblog: Mouse Jigglers, Fake PowerPoints: Workers Foil Bosses’ Surveillance Attempts - WSJ'
Hey, look, workplace surveillance doesn’t work.
🔗 linkblog: It’s Not Just You: Businesses Are Making Their Phone Numbers Hard to Find - WSJ'
What a crappy future we are heading toward.
🔗 linkblog: Texas Sues Google Over Use of Facial Images - WSJ'
I don’t like Paxton, and I can’t imagine this is much more than performative railing against a strawman version of Big Tech, but this is a real issue, so I’m interested to see where it goes.
🔗 linkblog: Social Network Parler Restructures, Focuses on ‘Uncancellable Economy’ - WSJ'
Look, Parler isn’t as bad as Gab, but this kind of softball, uncritical approach to the platform is not helpful. WSJ should know better.
🔗 linkblog: Amazon Buying Roomba Maker iRobot for $1.7 Billion - WSJ'
Amazon keeps getting bigger, and I don’t think that’s for the better.
🔗 linkblog: Big Tech Has Spent $36 Million on Ads to Torpedo Antitrust Bill - WSJ'
I haven’t read much about this bill, but it’s worrying that powerful entities have such an advantage in the debate about limiting their power.