<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Spencer Greenhalgh likes RSS and thinks you're great for using it</title><link>https://spencergreenhalgh.com/tags/infinite-campus/</link><description>recent posts from spencergreenhalgh.com</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 15:52:12 -0400</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://spencergreenhalgh.com/tags/infinite-campus/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title/><link>https://spencergreenhalgh.com/work/2026-05-13-infinite-campus/</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 15:52:12 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://spencergreenhalgh.com/work/2026-05-13-infinite-campus/</guid><description>
&lt;p&gt;Marketing yourself as &amp;ldquo;the tech in edtech&amp;rdquo; is not at all a flex like Infinite Campus seems to think it is. Like, all edtech is tech—that&amp;rsquo;s the point. I don&amp;rsquo;t know that I&amp;rsquo;d agree with &amp;ldquo;the ed in edtech&amp;rdquo; either, but I&amp;rsquo;d at least get what they&amp;rsquo;re going for. This just boggles me.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://spencergreenhalgh.com/2026-05-13-Infinite-Campus.JPEG" alt="An Infinite Campus logo with “the Tech in EdTech(TM)” underneath."&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><summary>Marketing yourself as “the tech in edtech” is not at all a flex like Infinite Campus seems to think it is. Like, all edtech is tech—that’s the point. I don’t know that I’d agree with “the ed in edtech” either, but I’d at least get what they’re going for. This just boggles me.</summary></item></channel></rss>