<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Spencer Greenhalgh likes RSS and thinks you're great for using it</title><link>https://spencergreenhalgh.com/tags/pervert-glasses/</link><description>recent posts from spencergreenhalgh.com</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 17:39:05 -0400</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://spencergreenhalgh.com/tags/pervert-glasses/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>🔗 linkblog: Meta just created a moderation nightmare for its smart glasses</title><link>https://spencergreenhalgh.com/communities/2026-07-24-hard-to/</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 17:39:05 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://spencergreenhalgh.com/communities/2026-07-24-hard-to/</guid><description>
&lt;p&gt;Hard to pick a single killer line from this one. There&amp;rsquo;s this paragraph:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Appreciate for a moment the bind Meta finds itself in: Its product allowed customers to behave so objectionably that the company responded with a content ban, as if to say “Stop making us look bad.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And then this conclusion hits hard:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In saying the company will police the creepiest version of smart glasses content but sidestepping deeper questions, Meta is trying to have it both ways: It gets to tout its enforcement while creating the conditions for this content to exist in the first place.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
</description><summary>🔗 linkblog: Meta just created a moderation nightmare for its smart glasses https://spencergreenhalgh.com/communities/2026-07-24-hard-to/</summary></item></channel></rss>