<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Spencer Greenhalgh likes RSS and thinks you're great for using it</title><link>https://spencergreenhalgh.com/tags/technical-morality/</link><description>recent posts from spencergreenhalgh.com</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 06:58:56 -0400</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://spencergreenhalgh.com/tags/technical-morality/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>🔗 linkblog: California Town Says Flock Cameras Misread License Plates 71% Of The Time</title><link>https://spencergreenhalgh.com/communities/2026-08-07-i-was/</link><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 06:58:56 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://spencergreenhalgh.com/communities/2026-08-07-i-was/</guid><description>
&lt;p&gt;I was reading some Jacques Ellul yesterday, where he noted that in &amp;ldquo;technical morality,&amp;rdquo; technology cannot do wrong, only the humans using the technology.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Flock&amp;rsquo;s response here seems to be a variation on that: The technology cannot be inaccurate, only the humans using it.&lt;/p&gt;
</description><summary>🔗 linkblog: California Town Says Flock Cameras Misread License Plates 71% Of The Time https://spencergreenhalgh.com/communities/2026-08-07-i-was/</summary></item></channel></rss>