I feel subversive (but absolutely justified) whenever I argue for interpreting “quantitative” data through an interpretivist lens.
Similar Posts:
I keep getting automated emails from work that I shouldn’t be getting, but I’m an edge case of what the inclusion criteria are. It’s frustrating, but also a good reminder of need to reflect on variable definitions in computational research. 😂
Just had the surprising experience of seeing the term “NPC” defined and explained in a responsible conduct of research training.
I set up a private Slack group for one of my classes today, and within 15 minutes, they had turned my face into a custom emoji. 😂
I just misread an email from my professional organization of choice as announcing the creation of a number of “research submarines.” Turns out they’re just working on “summaries.”
Beginning of semester dreams: I have written a not-great paper with my wife and the interim dean. We got feedback from Lyon-based bloggers (who like my Olympique de Marseille reference), and the dean wants to submit it to a top chemistry journal.
Comments:
You can click on the <
button in the top-right of your browser window to read and write comments on this post with Hypothesis. You can read more about how I use this software here.
Any Webmentions from Micro.blog will also be displayed below: