We should promote open science practices in social science projects where they make sense but also stop normalizing it in a way that ignores non-positivist paradigms.
Similar Posts:
I am increasingly of the opinion that the distinction between “qualitative” and “quantitative” isn’t all that useful and that what we actually mean is usually better expressed in other terms.
I feel subversive (but absolutely justified) whenever I argue for interpreting “quantitative” data through an interpretivist lens.
The focus on student learning in this year’s AECT reviews is good, but I worry that it blinds us to other important ed tech questions. I’d struggle to describe how surveillance, ethics, privacy impact student learning, but we desperately need that research too-or more!
I prefer not to get into the bad news, but the good news is that I’m learning a lot about how MySQL and WordPress work.
Learned an important lesson about platform dependence today. When I got hired at UK, I went all in on Google Drive to back up all my files; now, our institutional access is going to limit us to about 10% of the storage I was using. Going to be messy.
Comments:
You can click on the <
button in the top-right of your browser window to read and write comments on this post with Hypothesis. You can read more about how I use this software here.
Any Webmentions from Micro.blog will also be displayed below: