- one minute read - 23 words

Do other internet researchers find themselves citing journalists to explain things like memes? Or am I just not reading the right scholarly sources?

similar posts:

I think it’s funny (but delightful) that my secondary area of research has gotten more media attention than what I was specifically trained to do.

Remembering the time that the only person at church who understood my dissertation research was the one who worked for the state of Michigan doing social media surveillance of social justice movements.

Just reread “Superman Smashes the Klan” after a day that involved checking up on Gab for research purposes, and I believe more than ever that this is one of the best and most important comics of our time. 📚

One of those afternoons where I’m auditing someone’s analysis code, but it’s an analysis of 4M rows of data, so I’m also doing spurts of grading while I wait for code to execute.

Looks like it’s “I’m going to need some banana bread and chocolate chips to make it through the rest of this response to reviewers letter” o’clock.

comments:

You can click on the < button in the top-right of your browser window to read and write comments on this post with Hypothesis.