After Uvalde, social media monitoring apps struggle to justify surveillance - The Verge
date linked: 31 May 2022
source: link to article, from theverge.com
This article may make its way into a chapter I’m writing on how assumptions about education shape our understanding of what appropriate data collection looks like. As Audrey Watters has written, this kind of thing is very much edtech, and we need to be critical about how we deploy it. Even if it did work, I’m not sure the surveillance would be worth it. If it doesn’t work, all the more reason to be skeptical.
similar posts:
The focus on student learning in this year’s AECT reviews is good, but I worry that it blinds us to other important ed tech questions. I’d struggle to describe how surveillance, ethics, privacy impact student learning, but we desperately need that research too-or more!
🔗 linkblog: A Network of Fake Test Answer Sites Is Trying to Incriminate Students – The Markup'
🔗 linkblog: A Reporter Reflects on Covering Seven Mass Shootings — ProPublica'
🔗 linkblog: McConnell mum on guns as U.S. Senate recesses for a week – 89.3 WFPL News Louisville'
đź”— linkblog: Richard Scarry's 21st Century Classroom | Boing Boing'
comments:
You can click on the < button in the top-right of your browser window to read and write comments on this post with Hypothesis.