Spencer Greenhalgh
  • Myself
  • Relationships
  • Work
  • Communities
  • CV
HypothesisGoogle ScholarMicro.blog
WORK

April 20, 2023

Heading into finals, campus sent out a message about AI detection tools maybe not being trustworthy, which is great. However, this is in the context of these tools being wrapped into plagiarism detection software we already have access to, so they should say the same about it, too.

  • micro
  • Work
  • plagiarism software
  • AI
  • surveillance
  • edtech

You can use click on the < button in the top-right of your browser window to read and write comments on this post with Hypothesis. You can read more about how I use this software here.

Related

  • 🔗 linkblog: my thoughts on 'Software to detect school threats online is costly but mostly ineffective.'
  • 🔗 linkblog: my thoughts on 'ChatGPT Is So Bad at Essays That Professors Can Spot It Instantly'
  • 🔗 linkblog: my thoughts on 'Brief – Hidden Harms: Student Activity Monitoring After Roe v. Wade - Center for Democracy and Technology'
  • 🔗 linkblog: my thoughts on 'Students Are Using AI to Write Their Papers, Because Of Course They Are'
  • 🔗 linkblog: my thoughts on 'How to Protect Yourself If Your School Uses Surveillance Tech | WIRED'
  • 🔗 linkblog: my thoughts on 'When School Superintendents Market Surveillance Cameras'
  • Lance Eaton on the invasive surveillance of LMSs
Unless otherwise noted, the content on this website is by Spencer Greenhalgh and licensed under CC BY 4.0.
HypothesisGoogle ScholarMicro.blog