CNET Defends Use of AI Blogger After Embarrassing 163-Word Correction: ‘Humans Make Mistakes, Too’
Date Linked: 17 January 2023
Source: story link, from vice.com
Here, as with autocorrect and citation managers, my personal opinion is that any human who knows enough to use the tool critically knows enough to do the job themself. Maybe slower, sure, but slower isn’t always bad.
Similar Posts:
It amazes me that we all agree autocorrect spectacularly and regularly fails and yet believe that we can trust fundamentally the same tech to do harder work like grade homework, flag content, and suggest prison sentences.
🔗 linkblog: How ‘radioactive data’ could help reveal malicious AIs - The Verge'
I’ve seen jokes about the supposed irony of having to fill out a CAPTCHA to use ChatGPT, but it’s actually pretty consistent: The purpose of CAPTCHA is also to mine the fruits of human labor to train ML/AI that can replace human labor.
🔗 linkblog: Experts Warn ChatGPT Could Democratize Cybercrime - Infosecurity Magazine'
🔗 linkblog: Thanks to AI, it’s probably time to take your photos off the Internet | Ars Technica'
Comments:
You can click on the < button in the top-right of your browser window to read and write comments on this post with Hypothesis. You can read more about how I use this software here.