Moneyball: The Art of Winning an Unfair Game
Creator(s): Michael Lewis | Scott Brick |
Medium: book | audiobook |
Date Reviewed: 27 May 2025
Rating: ❤️❤️❤️🖤🖤
In many ways, this is a great book! It’s well written (and well read), and it made me care about baseball in ways I usually don’t. It’s also an interesting story—a great example of the power of statistics and data science to do cool things.
That last part, though, is why I read it. I expected to be critical of the book’s take, and I wasn’t wrong. It cheerleads attitudes about (data) science that I’m skeptical of, like its supposed superiority in terms of objectivity and rationality. It acknowledges the reduction of human beings into abstractions without ever really being skeptical of it. As cool as the core idea is, it’s also kind of a horror story, and we can see some of its scarier implications a couple of decades later.
So, well written, but unintentionally scary thesis.
- Moneyball: The Art of Winning an Unfair Game
- Michael Lewis
- Scott Brick
- baseball
- sports
- statistics
- data science
- objectivity
- rationality
Similar Posts:
Trying to figure out whether hate listening to the audiobook of Moneyball has implications for my suitability to teach my department’s Intro to Data Science class.
Okay, buying this Order of the Stick collection was worth it for this panel alone.
đź”— linkblog: The Simulation Says the Orioles Should Be Good
Sometimes I feel like I’m nagging my data science students when I tell them to use function x in R instead of almost-identical function y. Other times, I remember that function y has awful output that makes grading their work a pain, and I stop worrying.
Comments:
You can click on the <
button in the top-right of your browser window to read and write comments on this post with Hypothesis. You can read more about how I use this software here.