- one minute read - 17 words

I firmly believe that research is a process of argument—and that statistics are, therefore, a rhetorical device.

similar posts:

I got my job largely because I can work with Twitter data, and my tenure application is built on the premise that I do good Twitter research. I probably shouldn’t take as much pleasure as I do from watching the platform fall apart right now, but I was ready to move on anyway.

I think one of the most important things in learning to do research is understanding that it’s a process of argumentation more than a process of discovery.

I’ve been struggling with putting together a particular document for over a week. It’s like I’ve entirely forgotten how to do academic writing—something I usually feel pretty confident about.

My college is floating the idea of investing in GPT-type technology to help researchers code text data. This reminds me of my longtime belief that the distinction between “qual” and “quant” is often less important than the distinction between different research paradigms.

It’s four hours into my workday, so I guess it’s time to start doing that writing I blocked the whole day off for. 🙃

comments:

You can click on the < button in the top-right of your browser window to read and write comments on this post with Hypothesis.