I get why folks in ed compare ChatGPT to Wikipedia, but there are important differences. Wikipedia is entirely non-profit, lays bare its knowledge generation process, can be fixed on the fly, and can’t actively generate problematic content. It’s not just about reliability.
Similar Posts:
🔗 linkblog: AI hysteria is a distraction: algorithms already sow disinformation in Africa | Odanga Madung | The Guardian'
🔗 linkblog: Now you can block OpenAI’s web crawler - The Verge'
🔗 linkblog: Cleaning Up ChatGPT’s Language Takes Heavy Toll on Human Workers - WSJ'
draft syllabus statement on code, plagiarism, and generative AI
🔗 linkblog: The Fanfic Sex Trope That Caught a Plundering AI Red-Handed | WIRED'
Comments:
You can click on the < button in the top-right of your browser window to read and write comments on this post with Hypothesis. You can read more about how I use this software here.