“AI is as good as any rubric” (an actual statement I overheard at a campus-wide meeting), if true, is more of an indictment of current assessment practice than praise of AI quality.
similar posts:
🔗 linkblog: Research, curriculum and grading: new data sheds light on how professors are using AI
Saw an AI “summarize this discussion” button in Canvas today and it was a real downer. It seems to be only instructor-facing, which is better(?) but still makes me angry.
🔗 linkblog: Google would like you to study with Gemini instead of cheat with it
🔗 linkblog: Une lycéenne accusée d'avoir triché avec une IA au baccalauréat de philosophie obtient finalement son diplôme
🔗 linkblog: Microsoft, OpenAI, and a US Teachers’ Union Are Hatching a Plan to ‘Bring AI into the Classroom’
comments:
You can click on the < button in the top-right of your browser window to read and write comments on this post with Hypothesis.