Below are posts associated with the “privacy” tag.
🔗 linkblog: Workers report watching Ray-Ban Meta-shot footage of people using the bathroom
Hate this so much. The company statements are weaselly and gross. This also demonstrates one of the worst things about this whole issue. I would never buy Meta smart glasses, but I know two people in my life who own them, and the privacy burden of this product isn’t borne by the owner of the device so much as by those around them. Barf, barf, barf.
🔗 linkblog: How OpenAI caved to the Pentagon on AI surveillance
An important read on OpenAI’s seeming selling out.
🔗 linkblog: Meta won’t let morality get in the way of a product launch
Don’t think I’ve posted anything on this story yet because as the article points out, it’s hard to focus on this evil with so many other evils distracting us.
🔗 linkblog: Leaked Email Suggests Ring Plans to Expand ‘Search Party’ Surveillance Beyond Dogs
Who could possibly have predicted this?
🔗 linkblog: With Ring, American Consumers Built a Surveillance Dragnet
Ring sucks and is creepy. Here’s the killer paragraph from this story;
Unlike, say, data analytics giant Palantir or some other high-profile surveillance companies, Ring is a surveillance network that homeowners have by and large deployed themselves, powered by fear mongering against our neighbors and unfettered consumerism.
the paradox of YouTube recommendations
Over the past several months, I’ve noticed something funny about what kinds of video recommendations I get when I watch something on YouTube. I have watch history turned off on both my personal and professional Google accounts, so if I’m logged in to Google in the browser where I’m watching the video (usually on a desktop/laptop), I get pretty generic recommendations, with an obvious connection to the video at hand but no awareness of my past viewing. On my phone, though, I’m not logged into Google in my main browser, so if I bring up a video there, I get way more personalized recommendations that are very tied in to what I’ve previously watched on my phone.
🔗 linkblog: New Facial-Recognition Tech Could Let You Keep Your Passport in Your Pocket at the Airport
That this article talks up (and uncritically repeats) purported advantages of surveillance and only briefly acknowledges privacy concerns is a real failure. Reporting needs to do better so that we can walk back surveillance instead of sleepwalk into more of it. Gift link
🔗 linkblog: He got sued for sharing public YouTube videos; nightmare ended in settlement
Very happy for Linkletter, but it’s shameful that Proctorio got away with as much nonsense as it did.
🔗 linkblog: Police Said They Surveilled Woman Who Had an Abortion for Her 'Safety.' Court Records Show They Considered Charging Her With a Crime
Wish I’d made more of a stink about Lexington adopting Flock cameras. It’s a creepy-as-hell technology, and we need to get rid of them.
🔗 linkblog: New tech bolsters UK's law enforcement presence, but one priority requires buy-in from campus residents
5,000 cameras?! What the heck?
🔗 linkblog: Research, curriculum and grading: new data sheds light on how professors are using AI
Surprised that more isn’t made of the fact that Anthropic was surveilling users’ conversations for its research. Are professors and students thinking about the company’s ability to read everything they type?
🔗 linkblog: Flock Wants to Partner With Consumer Dashcam Company That Takes ‘Trillions of Images’ a Month
Did not realize that dashcam surveillance was a thing. I hate that it is, and I hate that Flock is going here.
🔗 linkblog: What the ‘Panama Playlists’ Exposed About Spotify User Privacy
Good article (here’s a gift link), and one worth adding to the right kind of syllabus.
🔗 linkblog: The Astronomer CEO's Coldplay Concert Fiasco Is Emblematic of Our Social Media Surveillance Dystopia
Good article. I’m not here to defend CEOs who have affairs with executives in their companies, but the tech ecosystem that allowed for this will do more harm to everyday people than it will ever hold CEOs to account.