Spencer Greenhalgh
  • Myself
  • Relationships
  • Work
  • Communities
  • CV
HypothesisGoogle ScholarMicro.blog
WORK

April 1, 2022

The focus on student learning in this year’s AECT reviews is good, but I worry that it blinds us to other important ed tech questions. I’d struggle to describe how surveillance, ethics, privacy impact student learning, but we desperately need that research too-or more!

  • micro
  • Work
  • AECT
  • edtech
  • surveillance
  • ethics
  • privacy

You can use click on the < button in the top-right of your browser window to read and write comments on this post with Hypothesis. You can read more about how I use this software here.

Related

  • 🔗 linkblog: my thoughts on 'A Network of Fake Test Answer Sites Is Trying to Incriminate Students – The Markup'
  • 🔗 linkblog: just read 'Ed Tech Usage is Up. So Are Parent Privacy Concerns'
  • 🔗 linkblog: my thoughts on 'George Washington University apologizes for tracking locations of students, faculty | TheHill'
  • 🔗 linkblog: my thoughts on 'Proctorio subpoenas digital rights group in legal spat with student - The Verge'
  • 🔗 linkblog: my thoughts on 'Pluralistic: 16 Feb 2022 – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow'
Unless otherwise noted, the content on this website is by Spencer Greenhalgh and licensed under CC BY 4.0.
HypothesisGoogle ScholarMicro.blog